Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 27, 2010No. SC 18181Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

The plaintiff, Darren Humphrey, commenced this action against the defendant, Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc., for damages that he allegedly had sustained when he slipped and fell on some grapes in a supermarket owned and operated by the defendant. Following a bench trial, the court rendered judgment for the defendant after finding that the plaintiff had failed to establish that the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the existence of the grapes on the floor. Shortly thereafter, this court decided Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc., 281 Conn. 768, 918 A.2d 249…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Dupré v. DupréSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  4. Humphrey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API