Legal Opinion

Humphrey v. GREAT ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 9, 2008No. 18181PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 796 (AC 28914), is granted, limited to the following issue:

James R. Fogarty, in support of the petition. Decided July 9, 2008

“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to apply the mode of operation rule as articulated in Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 467, 806 A.2d 546, cert. denied, 262 Conn. 912, 810 A.2d 278 (2002), to this slip and fall case?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18181.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Humphrey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Humphrey v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010