Legal Opinion

Starkweather v. Eddy

California Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 10525PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This action is one for malicious prosecution growing out of the acquittal of the plaintiff of a charge brought by the defendant of assault with a deadly weapon. The case was tried before the court without a jury, judgment being rendered in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appeals.

The assault charge arose out of the following facts: The plaintiff was a large stockholder in the Minarets Mining Company, a corporation, whose principal properties are located in the high Sierras in Mono and Madera Counties. For several years prior to the events about to be recounted, the plaintiff and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Runo v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Lee v. LevisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Sandell v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Redgate v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Jirku v. Brod.California Court of Appeal · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Singleton v. SingletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Schubkegel v. GordinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Portman v. KeeganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Garfield v. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Siffert v. McDowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API