Legal Opinion

Siffert v. McDowell

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1951No. Civ. 17834PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DORAN, J.—

This is an action for malicious prosecution against appellants for' damages sustained by the respondent Siffert on or about February 18, 1948, when Siffert was arrested and jailed for nine days under the provisions of sections 478-504 of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to the provisional remedy of arrest and bail. Respondent’s civil arrest was incident to a claim and delivery action instituted by appellant Harry F. McDowell to regain possession of a Plymouth automobile in respondent’s possession. A jury returned a verdict in favor of respondent Siffert in the amount of $25,000…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Singleton v. SingletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Walker v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Starkweather v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Masterson v. Pig'n Whistle Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Rupp v. SummerfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Consumers Filling Station Co. v. DuranteWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Grove v. Purity Stores, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Bernstein v. MaimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API