Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Graham v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1981No. Civ. 49594PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, J.

The present appeal, by the People, is from an order granting a peremptory writ of mandate, commanding the municipal court to set aside its previous order and permit Attorney Osby Davis to represent respondent, Willie Graham, who was charged with violating Penal Code section 273d (infliction of cruel bodily punishment on a child).

Following his retention by Graham, Davis was appointed to the Solano County Board of Supervisors; shortly thereafter, just prior to the Graham trial, the People moved to disqualify Davis on grounds of conflict of interest. The municipal court granted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. CrovediCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. CarlucciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hicks v. Bd. of Supervisors of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. People v. ReavesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murray Weiner,plaintiff-Appellant v. San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Pitts v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. KilbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Abbott Labs. v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Pitts v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API