Legal Opinion
Norwood v. Parenteau
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1954No. File 9375PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
' LEEDOM, J.
The State Board of Examiners in Optóme try, the respondents, pursuant to the authority of SDC 27.07, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, cited appellant, who had practiced optometry in South Dakota for about 30 years, to appear for a hearing before the Board on a charge of “unprofessional conduct”. The accusation of unprofessional conduct related entirely to the manner in which appellant had advertised the availability of his professional services. The evidence taken at the hearing disclosed that appellant’s manner of advertising did violate the rules…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Abelson's, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of OptometristsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Bartron v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. GillisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Kelley v. Duling Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re HinesleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Norwood v. ParenteauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.