Legal Opinion
In Re Hinesley
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1967No. File 10334PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Judge.
The Sanders-Hinesley Motor Sales of Sturgis was licensed to sell used motor vehicles. It was not licensed to sell new cars; and was not a franchised new car dealer. On June 21, 1965 the? Commissioner of Motor Vehicles suspended this dealer's license? for a period of six months for selling new Ford automobiles under its used motor vehicle dealer's license. The dealer appealed to Circuit Court which reversed the order of the Commissioner and reinstated its license. In doing so the trial court held SDC 1960 Supp. 44.02111(2) unconstitutional. That question is now here on appeal by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Olsen v. Nebraska Ex Rel. Western Reference & Bond Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kneip v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- McDonald v. Sch. Bd. of Yankton Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 1South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Salstrom's Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Aero Motors, Inc. v. Administrator, Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- South Dakota Board of Regents v. MeierhenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.