Bartron v. Codington County
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The above entitled companion causes have a single factual background and confront us with common and related contentions. To avoid repetition, we have determined to dispose of the issues presented therein by a single opinion.
The facts as found by the learned trial court are not in dispute. The assignments only question the sufficiency of the facts thus found to- sustain the conclusions of law and judgment. The central question of law to be determined is whether certain exhibited bargains between Codington County and the Bartron Clinic, a corporation for profit, pursuant to which such…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Iterman v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Norbeck & Nicholson Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. John H. Woodbury Dermatological InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals & Health SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Johnson v. Kreiser's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Meierhenry v. Spiegel, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Himrich v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.