Legal Opinion

Bartron v. Codington County

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1942No. File Nos. 8408, 8409, 8410PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The above entitled companion causes have a single factual background and confront us with common and related contentions. To avoid repetition, we have determined to dispose of the issues presented therein by a single opinion.

The facts as found by the learned trial court are not in dispute. The assignments only question the sufficiency of the facts thus found to- sustain the conclusions of law and judgment. The central question of law to be determined is whether certain exhibited bargains between Codington County and the Bartron Clinic, a corporation for profit, pursuant to which such…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Iterman v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Norbeck & Nicholson Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People v. John H. Woodbury Dermatological InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals & Health SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Johnson v. Kreiser's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. State Ex Rel. Meierhenry v. Spiegel, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Himrich v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API