Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. Gillis
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRentto, J.
The Commissioner of Revenue adopted an amendment to Rule 10 of the Rules and Regulations of the Department of Revenue relating to the alcoholic beverage laws- of this state. It provided that those licensed as distillers and wholesalers of intoxicating liquor may not sell, give or deliver to a licensee of any class any intoxicating liquor other than high point beer and wine, in any container which is larger than a quart., Prior to the amendment gallon and half gallon sizes were permissible.
The plaintiff, engaged in the business of marketing, selling and distributing numerous well-known and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Application of Dakota Transp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Blackman v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Norwood v. ParenteauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- Livestock State Bank v. State Banking CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by25 opinions
- Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Valley State Bank of Canton v. Farmers State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Application of Ed Phillips & Sons CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. MoschellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.