Legal Opinion
Ronald Ridings and Darvin D. Salyers v. Lane County, Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1988No. 87-4103PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs were employed as civil investigators in the office of the Lane County District Attorney prior to February 22, 1985. Their employment was terminated on that date. In this lawsuit against the County, they claim that they are entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207 (1982) (“FLSA”), for overtime hours allegedly worked between January of 1983 and the time that they were terminated. They also claim that their terminations constituted unlawful retaliation for their assertion of their overtime claims, and that they were thus…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jane Wharton-Thomas v. United States of America, United States Post Office and Pasquale J. Di Francisco, Jointly, Severally And/or in the AlternativeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Debbie Fiester, an Individual v. Allan TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bobby Marion Dixon v. Eddie YlstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Ellery Cornelius Oliver v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Kurtis Krause, Karlton Krause and Kelly KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Dorothy Bester v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Johnson v. PeterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.