Legal Opinion
Bobby Marion Dixon v. Eddie Ylst
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1993No. 91-15603PublishedCited by 128 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Dixon, a state prisoner, sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that prison officials denied him adequate medical treatment in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. The case went to trial. The magistrate judge granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. Dixon appeals, claiming that: (1) he was entitled to have an Article III judge, not a magistrate judge, try his case; (2) he was denied the right to call witnesses at his trial; and (3) the physical restraints applied to him during trial recesses interfered with his preparation. We affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Norman E. Tedder v. Edward Odel, Cpl., James Scott McAlisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiff- Cross-Appellee v. Instromedix, Inc., a Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Mary Carter v. Sea Land Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Kathleen Fellman v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Ronald Ridings and Darvin D. Salyers v. Lane County, OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
3Cited by128 opinions
- Louis Branch v. D. UmphenourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- C. Gilmore v. C. LockardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Denise Kay Anderson v. Woodcreek Venture Ltd James May Linda Brown Curtis BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Robert Ito Farm, Inc. v. County of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Lee A. Hatcher, Sr., Cross-Appellee v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis and Steven StaalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.