Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Peter

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 1, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01602Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 WAYNE JOHNSON, et al., CASE NO. 2:21-cv-1602-LK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 12 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 GILBERT PETER, et al., 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter came before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. 17 Dkt. No. 10. Before the Court enters a default judgment, Plaintiffs must demonstrate that the 18 Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter. See, e.g., Ridings v. Lane County, Oregon, 19

862 F.2d 231, 233

(9th Cir. 1988) (“[I]t…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, Lp, Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Nugget Hydroelectric, L.P. v. Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Ronald Ridings and Darvin D. Salyers v. Lane County, OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API