Jane Wharton-Thomas v. United States of America, United States Post Office and Pasquale J. Di Francisco, Jointly, Severally And/or in the Alternative
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment entered by a magistrate after a bench trial. The parties had consented to trial and entry of judgment in accordance with 1979 amendments to Federal Magistrates Act. We conclude that this procedure does not violate Article III of the United States Constitution and, on the merits, we affirm.
Plaintiff brought suit against the United States under the Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (1976 & Supp. V 1981), seeking compensation for personal injuries allegedly received in an automobile collision with a Postal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. SharifSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- K.M.C. Co., Inc. v. Irving Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc., a Corporation, Plaintiff- Cross-Appellee v. Instromedix, Inc., a Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Edna Goldstein v. Robert E. Kelleher, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Howard v. Collins, and United States of America, Intervenor v. William Foreman, Vincent Pilleters and Terry WardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.