Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Wiest

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 16, 2004No. 03-0106/AFPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, Chief Judge

Contrary to his pleas, Appellant, a cadet at the Air Force Academy, was convicted by officer members of one specification of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2000), by damaging a computer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(A)(5)(B) (2000).1 He was sentenced to a dismissal and total forfeitures. The convening authority approved the dismissal and partial forfeitures, and the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence.

Because we hold the military judge abused his discretion in refusing to grant a defense-requested…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  4. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. Joseph D. Slappy v. Paul John Morris, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  2. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  3. Wiest v. E-Fense, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  4. United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  5. United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API