Helmick v. Thomas

Plaintiffs brought this action to foreclose as mortgages two deeds given to secure a note. Defendants’ cross-complaint sought to quiet their title to the property represented by these deeds. The jury brought in a special verdict finding plaintiff John - N. Helmick guilty of fraud, menace and undue influence in obtaining defendants’ signa tures on the note and deeds, as was alleged in defendants’ answer and to cross-complaint. 1 Judgment was thereafter entered against plaintiffs on their complaint and in favor of defendants on their cross-complaint. Plaintiffs 2 have appealed from the judgment.