Kleinclaus v. Marin Realty Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
We granted a rehearing in this case to give further consideration to the question of appellants’ contributory negligence. Since respondents in their petition for rehearing did not question the accuracy of the recital of the basic facts in our opinion previously filed nor our conclusion that their negligence was clearly established we copy that portion of our previous opinion:
“Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment adverse to them in an action for damages for flooding their land. Plaintiffs were operating a private airfield and defendants, who had a contract with the United States Army Engineers to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fero v. . the Buffalo and State Line Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- LeRoy Fibre Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Tormey v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Schultz v. Town of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Flynn v. San Francisco & San Jose RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Tucson v. KoerberArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Buschman v. Anesthesia Business Consultants LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Green v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.