Archibald v. Cinerama Hotels
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Plaintiff Archibald appeals from a trial court order dismissing her class action against all defendants on grounds of forum non conveniens and additionally against defendant Waikiki Hotels-Seven for want of personal jurisdiction. We explain that because plaintiff is a California resident, the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss on grounds of forum non conveniens; even if Hawaii would provide a more convenient forum, as defendants contend, the authority of the trial court is limited to staying the California action pending proceedings in Hawaii. With…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
- Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.