Legal Opinion

Archibald v. Cinerama Hotels

California Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1976No. S.F. 23251PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Plaintiff Archibald appeals from a trial court order dismissing her class action against all defendants on grounds of forum non conveniens and additionally against defendant Waikiki Hotels-Seven for want of personal jurisdiction. We explain that because plaintiff is a California resident, the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss on grounds of forum non conveniens; even if Hawaii would provide a more convenient forum, as defendants contend, the authority of the trial court is limited to staying the California action pending proceedings in Hawaii. With…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API