State Compensation Insurance Fund v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
This appeal from a judgment dismissing an action for a tax refund challenges the validity of a provision of Proposition 103, approved by the electorate in 1989, which raised the rate of the insurance premium tax imposed by California Constitution article XIII, section 28. The State Compensation Insurance Fund (hereafter State Fund) is an “insurer” as defined by subdivision (a) of article XIII, section 28. In an earlier mandamus proceeding brought by another insurer, the Supreme Court declined to consider the issue raised in this appeal on the ground that California…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Independent Energy Producers Association v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Jensen v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- California School Boards Ass'n v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996