Jensen v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
This is a challenge to the constitutionality of the Mental Health Services Act, added by California voters through an initiative measure, Proposition 63, at the November 2, 2004 General Election (Proposition 63). Proposition 63 expands funding for mental health services for all Californians by imposing an additional tax of 1 percent on annual income in excess of $1 million. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 17043.) Proposition 63 also prevents future state funding for mental health services from falling below the amounts allocated for these services in 2003. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5891.)
2Cases cited41 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gilbert Hyatt v. Betty YeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Kimco Staffing Services, Inc. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Doe v. FinkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Coachella Valley Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.