Legal Opinion

Independent Energy Producers Association v. McPherson

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2006No. S135819PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

As in the recent case of Costa v. Superior Court (2006) 37 Cal.4th 986 [39 Cal.Rptr.3d 470, 128 P.3d 675] (Costa), we granted review in this case after a lower court, in an expedited preelection decision, directed that a proposed initiative measure—in this case, Proposition 80—be withheld from the November 8, 2005, election ballot. Unlike the situation presented to this court in Costa, however, in the present case the lower court’s action was not based upon a determination that the initiative failed to comply with a procedural requirement relating to the circulation of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. McFadden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Perry v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. City of Los Angeles v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API