Legal Opinion

Lafayette Place Associates v. Boston Redevelopment Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 20, 1998PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

A jury found the defendants, the city of Boston (city) and the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA), liable for monetary damages for having breached a contract with the plaintiff, Lafayette Place Associates (LPA), for the sale of certain land (Hayward Parcel), and the BRA liable for the tort of intentional interference with LPA’s contractual relation with another entity, Campeau Massachusetts, Inc. (Campeau). The trial judge entered judgment against the city, and granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of the BRA, on the ground that it was not amenable to suit for an intentional…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Tribune Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. Whitney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Situation Management Systems, Inc. v. Malouf, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Feeney v. Dell Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. G. Jang v. Boston Scientific SciMed IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. Targus Group International, Inc. v. ShermanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API