Legal Opinion

Meiselman v. Meiselman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1983No. 594A82PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*281FRYE, Justice.

In this appeal, we must determine whether Michael Meiselman, a minority shareholder with a substantial percentage of the outstanding stock in a group of family-owned close corporations, is entitled to relief under N.C.G.S. § 55-125(a)(4) and N.C.G.S. § 55-125.1, the statutes granting trial courts the authority to order dissolution or another more appropriate remedy when “reasonably necessary” for the protection of the “rights or interests” of the complaining shareholder. In so doing, we will articulate for the first time the analysis a trial court is to apply in resolving suits…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. Gidwitz v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Topper v. Park Sheraton Pharmacy, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Brite v. . PennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Henry George & Sons, Inc. v. Cooper-George, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Simmons v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  2. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Brenner v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. John R. Baur v. Baur Farms, Inc. and Robert F. BaurSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API