Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Conrad

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 10, 1964No. 16,854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Kilbay, Judge:

The accused was convicted, under Article 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 933, of indecent exposure while seated in his car on a public street in Riverside, California, and was sentenced to dismissal and total forfeitures. The convening authority approved the conviction and sentence but an Air Force board of review set aside the findings of guilty and the sentence and ordered a rehearing on issues that have been made the subject of certain certified questions submitted by The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force. In addition, this Court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  2. United States v. SellersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. BryantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. RobertsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. LewisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. ConradUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  2. United States v. KindlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  3. United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  4. United States v. BrowderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  5. United States v. BeatyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API