Legal Opinion

United States v. Aaron Taylor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 25, 2012No. 11-2875PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RENDELL, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to consider whether, by including “without just cause or excuse” in the federal assault with a dangerous weapon statute, 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3), Congress intended to convert justification, ordinarily a common-law defense, into an element of the offense as to which the government bears the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Applying relevant Supreme Court precedent, we conclude that the existence of just cause or excuse is an affirmative defense to a § 113(a)(3) violation, and the defendant bears the burden of proving it…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Peter Bistrian v. Troy LeviCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Askia WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Bernard GreenspanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  4. Patricia Evankavitch v. Green Tree Servicing LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  5. City Select Auto Sales, Inc. v. David Randall Associates, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API