Legal Opinion
United States v. Askia Washington
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 28, 2017No. 16-2795PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Asida Washington was ensnared by a “stash house reverse sting” operation — one which hit many of the by-now-familiar beats.1 Acting on what appeared to be insider information from a drug courier, Washington and his three co-conspirators planned to rob a Philadelphia property where they thought 10 kilograms of cqcaine were being stored for distribution. But as they discovered on the day of the robbery, the “stash house” was a trap set by law enforcement. Then “courier” was an undercover federal agent with the Bureau of Alcohol,…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Craig Geness v. Jason CoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Nieves v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- United States v. Tracy ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Tracy Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Daryle SellersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.