City Select Auto Sales, Inc. v. David Randall Associates, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, Chief Judge:
[[Image here]]
I. INTRODUCTION
This action is a putative class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, on behalf of persons who received unsolicited fax advertisements from Defendant David Randall Associates, Inc. (“David Randall”) and its owner Defendant Raymond Miley, III, (hereafter “Defendants”) in the spring of 2006. The TCPA imposes on anyone who sends an unsolicited fax advertisement statutory damages of $500 per fax, which can be trebled if the violation was willful or knowing. 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(C), (b)(3)(B).
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Palm Beach Golf Center-Boca, Inc. v. John G. Sarris, D.D.S., P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- City Select Auto Sales, Inc. v. David/Randall Associates, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Klein v. Commerce Energy, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Hawk Valley, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Palm Beach Golf Center-Boca, Inc. v. SarrisDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.