Legal Opinion

United States v. Bernard Greenspan

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 17, 2019No. 17-2458PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIBAS, Circuit Judge.

Sometimes, the only plausible explanation for a lab's stream of payments to a doctor is cash for blood. Over seven years, Dr. Bernard Greenspan referred more than 100,000 blood tests to Biodiagnostic Laboratory Services. The Lab made more than $3 million off these tests. In exchange, the Lab gave Greenspan and his associates more than $200,000 in cash, gifts, and other benefits.

A jury convicted Greenspan of fraud and of taking bribes and kickbacks. He raises four claims of error. But none warrants reversal, particularly because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming.

Fi…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Linda Stone v. Troy Construction LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Malik NasirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Omar BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  4. Raymond Holloway, Jr. v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Antoinette AdairCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API