Legal Opinion

Downey v. Rymorowicz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1959No. Appeals, 129 and 130PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice McBride,

Joseph Downey and John Zemlavage suffered injuries in a collision of two motor vehicles, one operated by Zemlavage and owned by Downey; the other owned and operated by John Rymorowicz. By stipulation of counsel the action instituted by the plaintiffs was severed and Zemlavage was made an additional defendant by appropriate proceedings. At the trial the following verdict was rendered:

1. In favor of the plaintiff Downey and against the original defendant Rymorowicz in the sum of $7,000 and in favor of the plaintiff Zemlavage and against the original defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Galliano v. East Penn Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Johnson v. HetrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Beam v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Beatty v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Malitovsky v. Harshaw Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McKEE BY McKEE v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Lambert v. KatzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Cannon v. TaborSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Block v. BiddleDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Merkel v. ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API