Legal Opinion

Malitovsky v. Harshaw Chemical Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1948No. Appeals, 111 and 112PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

These are separate. appeals by defendants, Wilson Freight Forwarding Company (hereinafter called carrier) and Harshaw Chemical Company, (hereinafter called chemical company) from the refusal of the. court below to grant motions fbr judgment for defendants n. o. v. and for a hew trial in an action of trespass in which a jury rendered a joint verdict in favor of the plaintiff against both defendants.

The chemical company of Cleveland, Ohio, sold 20 drums of hydrofluoric acid to the Armstrong Cork Company. 20 steel drums of this acid were shipped f. o. b.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Bisson v. John B. Kelly, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Nelson v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Altomari v. KrugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Summit Hotel Co. v. National Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Skoda v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Tonik v. Apex Garages, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Heffernan v. RosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Roadman v. BelloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Wyke v. WardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API