Legal Opinion

McKEE BY McKEE v. Evans

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1988No. 00644PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

These are consolidated appeals from judgments entered on verdicts after appellants’ post-trial motions were denied, as well as from an order granting a new trial limited to damages.

Appellants, Colleen McKee (hereafter “Colleen”), Margaret Carroll (hereafter “Margaret”) and Ricky Joseph Waite (hereafter “Ricky”) contend that the trial court erred in not granting them a new trial on both liability and damages. *126Their specific representations before the court en banc concern the alleged erroneous admission of a police officer’s testimony relative to the point of impact of a head-on…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Lewis v. MellorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Whyte v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. MatroniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Browne v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Havasy v. ResnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API