Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Tabor

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 1, 1994No. 02708PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge.

This appeal has been taken from an order which denied the motion for post-trial relief filed by Hugh F. Cannon, III, and Mary Cannon (hereinafter appellants), as a result of which judgment was entered against them and in favor of Marek Tabor (hereinafter appellee), following a jury verdict in favor of appellee in this personal injury action instituted by appellants to recover damages for injuries sustained in an intersectional automobile accident. We vacate the judgment entered in favor of appellee and remand for a new trial.

The complaint, filed by appellants on January 25,…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Community College v. Community College, Society of the FacultySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Enfield v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Fleischman v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Brandimarti v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MatroniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Levey v. DeNardoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Drew v. WorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Sehl v. Vista Linen Rental Services Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. B.S. Mitchell v. M.M. MilburnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API