Consiglio v. Transamerica Insurance Group
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion,
LANDAU, J.
The defendant, Transameriea Insurance Group (Transameriea), appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiffs’1 application for an order compelling arbitration of their claim for under-insured motorist benefits. On appeal, Transameriea claims that the trial court improperly relied on this court’s decision in Prudential Property & Casualty Ins. Co. v. Perez-Henderson, 49 Conn. App. 653, 714 A.2d 1281, cert. denied, 247 Conn. 917, 722 A.2d 807 (1998) (Prudential). Specifically, Transameriea extends two invitations to us: first, it invites us to revisit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McGlinchey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Bayusik v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Hotkowski v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Perez-HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. ElsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Wille v. Geico Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Gohel v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.