Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Whaland
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The primary question presented by this appeal is whether under the form of regulating insurance, the State may require that specific benefits be provided by a plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (Erisa), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 etseq., which provides insurance coverage for a State resident employed in this State and his dependents. Defendant ruled that the State may regulate such a plan under RSA 415:18-a (Supp. 1977), which regulates the content of group policies. Plaintiff timely filed a motion for rehearing. After a further hearing, defendant reaffirmed his…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Attorney General v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Attorney General v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Insurance Commissioner of the State v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- FLORIDA AUTO. DEALERS INDUSTRY v. SmallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.