Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Whaland

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 28, 1979No. 78-220PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether under the form of regulating insurance, the State may require that specific benefits be provided by a plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (Erisa), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 etseq., which provides insurance coverage for a State resident employed in this State and his dependents. Defendant ruled that the State may regulate such a plan under RSA 415:18-a (Supp. 1977), which regulates the content of group policies. Plaintiff timely filed a motion for rehearing. After a further hearing, defendant reaffirmed his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Attorney General v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Attorney General v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Insurance Commissioner of the State v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. FLORIDA AUTO. DEALERS INDUSTRY v. SmallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API