Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Travelers Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 25, 1984PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

General Laws c. 175, § 47B, specifies mandatory minimum mental health care coverage under certain insurance policies.2 The defendants declined to include such *731coverage in policies issued to welfare benefit plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (1976 & Supp. V 1981). The Attorney General brought this action to compel the defendants to comply with § 47B. The defendants argued that § 47B is preempted by ERISA. A judge of the Superior Court ordered the defendants to comply with § 47B, and we affirmed. 385 Mass. 598 (1982). The defendants…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. City of Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Bate Refrigerating Co. v. SulzbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Commonwealth v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. Commissioner of Health & HospitalsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc. of Missouri v. FrappierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. Barry v. Dymo Graphic Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API