Legal Opinion

Joshua Daniel Bishop v. Warden, GDCP

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 8, 2013No. 10-15442PublishedCited by 194 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARCUS, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Joshua Daniel Bishop was convicted in 1996 of malice murder and armed robbery, and sentenced to death. He appeals from the district court’s denial of habeas relief, raising two categories of claims: (1) three instances of ineffectiveness of trial counsel, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); and (2) a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). After thorough review, we conclude that Bishop is not entitled to relief on any of these claims, and accordingly affirm.

I

A

The basic…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by194 opinions

  1. Christopher Taft Landers v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Nejad v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  3. Kelvin Leon Reed v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Damion Hayes v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  5. Thomas Dewey Pope v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API