Legal Opinion
Strougo v. Bassini
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 2000No. 99 CIV. 3579(RWS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Nominal defendant The Brazilian Equity Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”), defendants BEA Associates (“BEA”), Emilio Bassini (“Bas-sini”), Richard Watt (‘Watt”), Daniel Sigg (“Sigg”) (collectively, the “BEA Defendants”), and defendants Dr. Enrique R. Arzac (“Arzac”), James J. Cattano (“Catta-no”), Peter A. Gordon (“Gordon”), George W. Landau (“Landau”) and Martin M. To-rino (“Torino”) (collectively, the “Outside Directors,” and together with the Fund, BEA and the BEA Defendants, the “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss the shareholder derivative complaint of plaintiff Robert…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Strougo v. Bea AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- In Re UnitedHealth Group Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Strougo v. BassiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Strougo ex rel. Brazilian Equity Fund, Inc. v. BassiniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Strougo v. BEA ASSOCIATESDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.