Legal Opinion
Strougo v. Bea Associates
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 4, 2001No. 98 Civ. 3725(RWS)PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Strougo (“Strougo”) has moved to compel the production of fourteen items listed in the privilege logs of defendant BEA Associates (“BEA”). BEA opposes the motion and claims attorney-client and work product privilege. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part, and certain of the documents at issue shall be produced for in camera review.
Prior Proceedings
The prior proceedings and factual background of this action are set forth in the prior opinions of this Court, familiarity with which is assumed. See Strougo…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re Chevron CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- HSH Nordbank AG New York Branch v. SwerdlowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Henry v. Champlain Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Fox News Network, LLC v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Gulf Islands Leasing, Inc. v. Bombardier Capital, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.