Legal Opinion
In re Latifa K.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 29, 2002No. AC 20950PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The respondent father1 appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his minor children, L and S. On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motion to amend the petitions to terminate his parental rights filed by the petitioner and (2) denied his request to strike a sentence in a social study as inadmissible hearsay. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural histoiy are relevant to our resolution of this appeal. At the time of trial, the respondent was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- In re Roshawn R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- In re Romance M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- In re Stanley D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. RolliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parker v. SlosbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- In re Jennifer W.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. John G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. VidroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- In re Halle T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.