Legal Opinion
In re Romance M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 6, 1993No. 10511; 10568PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
These two appeals arise from petitions brought to the trial court by the commissioner of children and youth services (DCYS) to terminate the parental rights of Gail M. as to her four children.
Appeal 10568 is an appeal by Gail M. from the termination of her parental rights with respect to three of her children. Appeal 10511 is an appeal by the commissioner from the trial court’s decision not to terminate Gail M.’s parental rights with respect to the child Romance.
We will discuss each appeal separately, but the common factual underpinning to both appeals is the trial court’s factual findings…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. RollinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- LaBow v. LaBowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- In re Felicia D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- In re B.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- In re Antonio M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Fannon v. JohnstonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.