Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Martin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1993No. 113PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Following a jury trial, Barbara Martin was convicted of hindering apprehension. The trial court denied posttrial motions. A sentence of six months probation was imposed. This appeal followed. For the reasons below, we vacate the judgment of sentence, reverse the order denying suppression and remand for a new trial.

On appeal, appellant claims: (1) that the suppression court erred when it failed to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a warrantless search of appellant’s home; (2) that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury that her request that the police obtain a search…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. FromalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Com. of Pa. v. RomeroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. MunizSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. ShifletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. ConceptionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API