Commonwealth v. Martin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Following a jury trial, Barbara Martin was convicted of hindering apprehension. The trial court denied posttrial motions. A sentence of six months probation was imposed. This appeal followed. For the reasons below, we vacate the judgment of sentence, reverse the order denying suppression and remand for a new trial.
On appeal, appellant claims: (1) that the suppression court erred when it failed to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a warrantless search of appellant’s home; (2) that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury that her request that the police obtain a search…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. FromalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Com. of Pa. v. RomeroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. MunizSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. ShifletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Commonwealth v. ConceptionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.