Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Muniz

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 2010No. 962 MDA 2009PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

OLSON, J.:

Appellant, Eric Raul Muniz, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on April 28, 2009, sentencing him to incarceration for convictions of possession with intent to deliver cocaine, possession with intent to deliver marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. 1 For the following reasons, we affirm.

The trial court summarized the relevant facts and procedural history of this matter as follows:

The evidence presented at trial established that [Appellant] was the only person in the first floor apartment at 446 Fremont Street on the morning of July 12, 2007, when…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. ChampneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. ValetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BowenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. EsteppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Com. of Pa. v. RomeroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. LowrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. RomeroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API