Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Shiflet

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1995No. 34 Middle District Appeal Docket 1994PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

In this appeal we must consider whether the search incident to arrest exception to the warrant requirement of Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution can justify a warrantless search and seizure of Appellee’s purse, when Appellee was not arrested and there was neither probable cause nor an articulable suspicion that Appellee was involved in criminal activity. We' find that the search incident to arrest exception clearly does not apply to the facts of this case, and therefore affirm the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. PrattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. RunyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. CrouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API