Legal Opinion

Com. of Pa. v. Romero

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 2018No. 37 EAP 2016; No. 38 EAP 2016PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ.

Justice Wecht delivers the Opinion of the Court with respect to Part II(A) and announces the Judgment of the Court. The Opinion is joined in full by Justices Todd and Donohue and Justice Mundy joins Part II(A).

OPINION

JUSTICE WECHT

In these discretionary appeals, we consider an unsettled question in the jurisprudence concerning the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. That provision states:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Rush, M. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Commonwealth v. DukeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Com. v. Mullen, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Com. v. Boyd Chisholm, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Jones, J. v. Erie InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API