Legal Opinion
Johnny Watson v. Eastman Kodak Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 21, 2000No. 99-3520PublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Johnny Watson alleges that he was removed from his position of Account Executive at Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) because of unlawful race and age discrimination. Under federal law, a complainant has 300 days from the date of the adverse employment decision to file a claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). In Delaware State College v. Ricks, 449 U.S. 250, 101 S.Ct. 498, 66 L.Ed.2d 431 (1980), the Supreme Court held that an adverse employment action occurs, and the statute of limitations therefore begins to run, at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chardon v. FernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Joseph C. Shields v. John ZuccariniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Ruehl v. Viacom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Williams v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Anthony Hildebrand v. Allegheny CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.