Legal Opinion

Williams v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 30, 2017No. 16-4383PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

Cheryl Williams, an African-American woman, claims that she was subjected to constant harassment at the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (the “Commission”) by her supervisors, Joseph Retort and Adam Stalczynski. As a result of this treatment, she alleges she faced a hostile work environment and was ultimately constructively discharged from her position as a Human Relations Representative. She then filed this action against the Commission under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 1 seeking damages for the loss of her job…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Kaleena Bullington v. Bedford Cty., Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Rachel Post v. Trinity Health-MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  3. Does v. Southeast Delco School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Zurchin v. Ambridge Area Sch. Dist.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Williams v. Temple Univ. Hosp., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API