Williams v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
Cheryl Williams, an African-American woman, claims that she was subjected to constant harassment at the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (the “Commission”) by her supervisors, Joseph Retort and Adam Stalczynski. As a result of this treatment, she alleges she faced a hostile work environment and was ultimately constructively discharged from her position as a Human Relations Representative. She then filed this action against the Commission under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 1 seeking damages for the loss of her job…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Kaleena Bullington v. Bedford Cty., Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Rachel Post v. Trinity Health-MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Does v. Southeast Delco School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Zurchin v. Ambridge Area Sch. Dist.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Williams v. Temple Univ. Hosp., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.