Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Curtis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 13, 1949No. 41337PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

On application of the State Highway Commission, relator, we issued our alternative writ of mandamus to require respondent circuit judge to accept jurisdiction of all issues tendered in relator’s condemnation petition pending before respondent as judge of the circuit court of Pulaski County, or to show cause for his failure to do so. Respondent has filed his return and the case is brought to issue by relator’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Relator’s condemnation petition is in conventional form, describing certain parcels of land with the names of the owners; reciting the preliminary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. City of Kirkwood v. VenableSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. Fielder v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Lane v. PankeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re Armory Site in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. State Ex Inf. Dalton v. Land Clearance for Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. State Ex Rel. Priest v. GunnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. State ex rel. Jackson v. DolanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API