State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. James
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
rMandamus. On petition of the State Highway Commission, relator, we issued our alternative writ requiring the respondent circuit judge to accept and exercise jurisdiction of all issues tendered in a condemnation suit filed by relator in his court, or to show cause Why he should not do so. Respondent made return and the cause is brought to issue by relator’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
The petition filed by relator in the circuit court is in furtherance of a plan duly adopted by the Commission for the improvement of about six miles of Highway 40 in Jackson County, by the construction…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Castilo v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Chaplin v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
3Cited by29 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ClevengerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Holloway v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Vorhof-Duenke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.