Legal Opinion

City of Kirkwood v. Venable

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 6, 1943No. 38358PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action by plaintiff, a municipal corporation organized and existing under Art. 7, Chap. 38, R.S. 1939, to condemn four described lots in said city for a public park. By answer defendant Venable, the owner of the lots, alleged that because of its location the property was "not fit or suitable for public use"; that the proceeding was not brought in good faith; that the described lots were not sought "to be taken for public use and for public parks or squares for the benefit of the residents of the city," but to destroy the property, demolish the improvements, improve the immediate neighborhood…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ligare v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kansas City v. LiebiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  3. County Court v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Kansas City v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. City of St. Louis v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. In Re Armory Site in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Everett v. County of ClintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  5. School District of Clayton v. KelseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1946

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API