Legal Opinion

State v. Wolfley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1907No. 15,101PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Meade district court; Edward H. Madison, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Jake Wolfley appeals from a conviction upon a charge of stealing six head of cattle. The court concludes after a careful consideration of the briefs and record that no material error is shown. To discuss in detail each assignment made would extend this opinion unduly, and only those thought to be of the most importance will be mentioned specifically.

The complaint that questions were asked which assumed as true certain facts prejudicial to the defendant is unavailing, because the witness had already given evidence supporting such assumption.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BolangerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State v. CardelliNevada Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hurst v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Stewart v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. State of Kansas v. KillionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Fleishman v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. State v. RinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API