McDowell, Pyle & Co. v. Hopfield
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtAVaesii, J.
Tlie question to be determined in this case is whether or not the claim of a prior assignee of a chose in action, where no notice of the assignment was given to the debtor, is superior to the claim of a subsequent attaching creditor who has secured a judgment of condemnation against the debtor as garnishee.
McDowell, Pyle & Company of Baltimore City became indebted to Wirth Concord Ade Company of Providence, Rhode Island; in the sum of $332.86 for merchandise purchased at various times .in July, 1923. The money thus due from McDowell, Pyle & Company. was assigned by Wirth Concord Ade Company…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wood v. PartridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Walters v. Washington Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1855
- Brown v. SomervilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Cramer v. RoderickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
- Baldwin ex rel. Owens v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Russell v. Fred G. Pohl Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Maryland Cooperative Milk Producers, Inc. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Seymour v. Finance & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
- Pen Mar Co. v. AshmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Bank of Bethesda v. KochCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.